

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Killzone 2 is an undisputed winner graphically</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.talkplaystation.com/killzone-2-is-an-undisputed-winner-graphically/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.talkplaystation.com/killzone-2-is-an-undisputed-winner-graphically/</link>
	<description>Playstation 3 News, PS3 Games Screenshots, Videos, Cheats, Walkthroughs, Release Dates &#38; Pre-Order Info</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 11:46:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tahiri's older brother</title>
		<link>http://www.talkplaystation.com/killzone-2-is-an-undisputed-winner-graphically/comment-page-1/#comment-8110</link>
		<dc:creator>Tahiri's older brother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukoffer.com/?p=12868#comment-8110</guid>
		<description>&quot;Experts have said that the game is the Undisputed Winner in terms of graphics power&quot;

Not quite, that &#039;expert&#039; said that graphically killzone 2 is &quot;AN undisputed winner&quot; (as reported), which means it looks truly awesome. Same as we&#039;ve seen with albums, books, movies, food, games etc when described as &#039;an undisputed winner&#039;.

Yet so many times online I&#039;m seeing the word &quot;AN&quot; being replaced with &quot;THE&quot; for this report which completely changes the meaning! And for some reason, the origins of this report is not being posted by those reporting it, so here it is;

http://www.digitalfoundry.org/blog/?p=138

I&#039;m looking forward to Killzone as much as the next gamer, but I wish people would stop distorting words.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Experts have said that the game is the Undisputed Winner in terms of graphics power&#8221;</p>
<p>Not quite, that &#8216;expert&#8217; said that graphically killzone 2 is &#8220;AN undisputed winner&#8221; (as reported), which means it looks truly awesome. Same as we&#8217;ve seen with albums, books, movies, food, games etc when described as &#8216;an undisputed winner&#8217;.</p>
<p>Yet so many times online I&#8217;m seeing the word &#8220;AN&#8221; being replaced with &#8220;THE&#8221; for this report which completely changes the meaning! And for some reason, the origins of this report is not being posted by those reporting it, so here it is;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.digitalfoundry.org/blog/?p=138" rel="nofollow">http://www.digitalfoundry.org/blog/?p=138</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to Killzone as much as the next gamer, but I wish people would stop distorting words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paranoimia</title>
		<link>http://www.talkplaystation.com/killzone-2-is-an-undisputed-winner-graphically/comment-page-1/#comment-8109</link>
		<dc:creator>Paranoimia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukoffer.com/?p=12868#comment-8109</guid>
		<description>&quot;even though Killzone 2 hasnâ€™t touched the movie that got folks hopes so high&quot;

So says the source site, BingeGamer.

They can&#039;t have been playing the same beta as me, then. The actual game is at least as good as, if not better than, the E3 2005 video.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;even though Killzone 2 hasnâ€™t touched the movie that got folks hopes so high&#8221;</p>
<p>So says the source site, BingeGamer.</p>
<p>They can&#8217;t have been playing the same beta as me, then. The actual game is at least as good as, if not better than, the E3 2005 video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
