Killzone 2 Producer: “Lets try to unlock PS3’s power”
- September 15th, 2008
- Posted in News/Announcements
- By Talk Playstation
- Write comment
The Playstation 3 has more power than you think! According to the producer of Killzone 2 the PS3 is a lot more futureproof.
The machine itself is a lot more futureproof, there’s a lot more to it – the whole idea of SPUs and the cell processor, I think they’re a lot more enticing, because there’s just that much more power under the hood that people want to explore – I think the techheads will look at the specs and say, well, let’s try and unlock all of that power
Similar Posts:
- Far Cry 2 features smoother graphics on PS3?
- DICE: Cell Processor is very powerful
- Insomniac Games can perform tricks on PS3
- First Killzone 2 patch
- God of War 3 – only possible on PS3
- Red Faction: Guerrilla – Better graphics on PS3
- Killzone 2 Cell usage
- Killzone 2 designer moves on
- Sony designed PS3 to be hard to develop for
- Killzone 2 to appeal to all players
- Killzone 2 only using 60% of SPU’s Overall Power?
- Japan will get Killzone 2 and two demo’s
It might have the hardware, but it’s price is too high. The 360 will end up beating it
The hardware has longevity over the 360.
Well it has the hardware right now… but again, price is too high (current price) for most people to want to purchase it. Plus, it won’t have the longevity. I give it a 9/10 chance that the next system won’t have nearly the emphasis on physical media, but digitially distributed media. You already see it with warhawk, or other similar games.
…No.
I’m a Playstation fan but I have to admit, the PS3 is obviously slightly less powerful than the 360. This has been proven time and time again. Why are we even still talking about it ? Anyway, looking forward to Killzone 2 !
PS3 is slightly less? Howcome?
please present your proof and don’t say that most cross platform games look better on the 360.
The Cell, reaching a performance that’s 22 times higher than Intel’s Woodcrest (xbox),is comparable to a 256-processor BlueGene/L supercomputer. With all the different processors added up, PS3 can perform twice as many raw calculations per second.The XDR DRAM will move data at 12.5GB/s which is bigger than any xbox game ever made.You are dead wrong.
okay what you said makes no sense. First off the cell processor in a PS3 is a stripped down cell processor, and basically, it isn’t even that hard to find a computer processor that can trump it performance wise(put the PS3 cell vs an Intel Q6600 and see what happens). Also, I know the cell can handle graphics, but since when could a cpu, even the supposedly all-knowing and all-powerful cell processor, become more useful to game making then a powerful gpu and fast ram. And I would like to point out that the gpu in the xbox 360 is FAR more powerful than the one on the PS3. That is why the PS3 has such poor lighting and the textures are usually worse than on 360(also the 360 has more Ram available for video processing than the PS3, about twice as much). So all in all the PS3 isn’t as powerful as the xbox 360 and if it is more powerful, then it is marginally faster(for games I mean. Don’t try that crap about how the PS3 is a super computer because I am talking strictly games rite now). Also, a 10 year lifespan is laughable for the PS3. The next gen Xbox and Wii systems will be much more powerful than the PS3 and are coming within the next 2-3 years.
ps3 is more powerful you dont know what ur on about psfan. the reason you may think that is due to developers being so impatien, releasing games fast to make money on them rather than really spending time on making it best they can. who cares about release dates anyway if the game is just gonna be poor quality when it comes out. they’re wasting their time and peoples money on making games that you’ll get rid of in 1 week after you complete it and get bored. thankfully games such as MGS4 put those games in their place (the bargain bins) and the sooner developers realise the potential of the ps3 and start putting it to use the sooner we can stert getting some true next gen games worth paying for! xbox360 is good for 2 things, a childs booster seat and holding the door open when its hot.
I 100% agree with your statement, well said!
That and developing games are allot more expensive that what it used to be.
Ahhh trolls lol.
The fact of the matter is, on paper, PS3 is far superior technically then any other console/platform out there. But in reality, and in ‘practice’ it is still not too ahead of the 360 technically speaking.
Obviously I am talking about 3rd party games because you could easily compare any first party PS3 title to any first party 360 title and majority of them would be better looking on PS3 (Uncharted, KZ2 etc).
But when talking about normal devs creating games on multiple platforms, PS3 is first of all harder to get running then it is on 360. An example is with CoD4, as they had to do more work and put more experienced coders on the PS3, to get it and 360 equal on the same page.
This is of course changing gradually with experience, as in 07 most multiplatform games would look slightly better on 360, in 08 majority of multiplatform games look pretty even, and I think in 09 we will start seeing the same thing that happened in 07 but the opposite, where many multiplatform titles will have a slight edge on the PS3, and this will only grow as time goes on and experience with the hardware grows.
tht is correct
Man, you guys are what give’s Playstaion fans a bad name.
You guy’s always buy into whatever Sony feeds you.
Sony says it’s the most powerful console ever, that all you need, you’ll eat it right up.
C’mon guys, use your heads, think for yourselves and do some reading.
The PS3 wont ever be able to put more than 256 megs of information on the screen at a given moment.
Sony has built a great device, it’s reliable, Blu-ray is a great feature and they have some great exclusive games.
There’s room in the market for all 3 consoles and each has it’s own set of pro’s and con’s but to say the PS3 can push better visuals than the 360 during actual gameplay is absurd.
I really like the PS3 but I do know where to draw the line.
use YOUR head. Your conjecture is misleading people.
Apparently you don’t know what your talking about. The PS3 will push better quality games as time passes. We’ve seen it happen during the First PlayStation, and again during the PlayStation 2. It’ll only take time for the PlayStation 3 for it to get there.
I want to see you try and try programming and designing on the PS3, let’s see how far you get.
PS3 has already proven so, example Metal Gear Solid 4, Resistance 2, etc.
The only developers that are going to bring the full power of the PlayStation 3 are Sony themselves. Costs are higher than it was during the PlayStation and PlayStation 2 era. Visually they will look equal for multi plat games, depending on which one was designed first and how much the developer does on each console.
When the Xbox 360 released back in 2005, does the games look as pretty as it does now in 2008? I think not, developers are slowly making games better as time passes.
There is room for all the consoles out there, but this fanboy war is just complete idiocy. Just let me choose what console I want to play on and leave me be.
The PlayStation 3 has 256 MB of XDR main memory and 256 MB of GDDR3 video memory for the RSX.Its nVidia based GPU is also capable of accessing the main system memory which is comprised of XDR DRAM designed by Rambus. This memory uses internal terminators, enabling it to better handle certain graphics demands. To improve bandwidth, GDDR3 memory transfers 4 bits of data per pin in 2 clock cycles. Please know what your talking about before you post.
talking out of your a$$. what a dope.
psfan, You are not a ps fan. You are probably an Xbox fan posing as a PS fan so that people take you seriously. If you were a Playstation fan you probably would have seen that the PS3 exclusives look far better than the xbox exclusives in general. You would have also seen that on paper the PS3 is far more powerful. I’m not quite sure what you are doing here, but you are misleading people based upon your on misinformed opinion.
BTW, they are both good systems. I’m just stating some facts so that people are not misled. Do some research at unbiased sites and you will find that i tell the truth
Sorry to jump your case, but they are not both good systems. The 360 is a joke. The PS3 is the serious gaming machine of the current generation.
Yea I can agree with that i guess :]
wow, well that is a very fanboyish comment if I’ve heard one. TO say the 360 is a joke, but ps3 “serious gaming machine” is a little ridiculous. The ps3 has been plagued with issues as well (a certain firmware update). While not as widespread as the 360, it certainly has had its issues. And should the whole topic of games even be brought up, when currently, the 360 is winning?
You guys take this crap too seriously. The Cell is definitely more powerful than the 360 CPU but the GPU they use in the PS3 is last gen. The Cell has 7 cores each one comprised of certain number of threads. Each thread can have code programmed onto it. The games don’t look better on the PS3 because of the GPU, they look better because devs are starting to figure out how to program for each core (Sony is forcing them to do this which will in turn add to the development time on a game). This is a good thing. With devs learning how to program for the Cell they’ll be able to exploit the 360’s cpu (3 cores). In the end, the 360 has the more efficient operating system (using only 6% of RAM while the PS3’s uses 30%) has a more available RAM (512mb rather than 256mb+256mb that Sony uses) and a more powerful GPU. The only thing edge the PS3 has over the 360 is blu-ray, bigger HDD and the CELL. Before you start labeling me as a 360 fanboy I don’t own either console. Grow up and read the facts. Neither is better than the other and both offer something to their user base. Both are great systems, with great games.
I DO own both systems and I have to say there is 1 major factor that anyone should consider before purchasing either: Reliability.
Ive owned 1 ps3 and 4 xbox 360’s. Both do have great games though.
happy 2 see im not the only one who own 1ps3 and 4xbox 360 thats crazy 2 think i still like 360more lol. If i had 2 rate the two systems xbox 360 would get a 8 and ps3 6 all that power that no programmer knows how 2 use how 2 use nice and who’s idea was that.
“The Cell is definitely more powerful than the 360 CPU but the GPU they use in the PS3 is last gen” < The ps3 gpu and memory were designed in to allow the cell and spus to do their thing.
I’m used to the controller, I enjoy Blu-ray movies and gaming however when I see the games I own for my PS3 running better on the 360, I must concede. It’s not like the difference’s are drastic but they are noticeable.
Sure developers are going to become more proficient with the PS3 but at the same time they are getting better with the 360.
Also, when I see how seamless Xbox Live is compared to what PSN is like I have to admit I would pay for that.
I dont regret my purchase however, I’m not willing to give up the Blu-ray player but if I were doing more gaming I think I’d have to get a 360.
seriously, i understand that crossplatform games may look slightly better on xbox, but I dont understand how you can even argue that the xbox is more powerful. I hear this so often from xbox users, but its simply not true. As an owner of all platforms, i prefer my xbox 360 for the variety of games, but i would never even try to argue what you are attempting, as its simply wrong
Spoken like a true psfan
whoops, that one was for psfan, sorry
Seriously, what makes XBL more “seamless” than PSN? I only own a PS3 but have owned a 360. It’s not a bad machine but I didn’t see what all the fuss is about. From my experience about the only thing you can do on XBL that you can’t do on PSN is cross-game invites or join a friend already in a game. So what. Playing on-line is just as easy on both machines.
There are features that XBL has over PSN, and the same goes true for PSN has features over XBL. I don’t see why you would want to pay for Xbox Live, since basically the only thing it is used for is getting content before silver members, and playing multiplayer, I don’t see anything spectacular on XBL over PSN. But I already pay for XBL, so blah I really don’t care. As long as I enjoy my experience I’m cool with what I do.
killzone 2 is going to be ok they have to get pass cod4 in order to be great but i do not think they will. they will fall short in terms of the gameplay and other thing and ps3 and the 360 are equal and wii on a other level before u guy talk shit i own all 3 ps3/360/wii…..
Killzone2 will make people forget COD exists.
“they will fall short in terms of the gameplay” <- I wouldn’t be too sure about that. The gameplay looks awesome so far.
there ant no way killzone will better than cod4 call cod4 set bonders thats hard to beat but killzone2 does have it sorry ps3 fans….
I didn’t like Call of Duty 4. So I have high hopes for Killzone 2
I feel soooo bad 4 360 fanboys who wer impatient& bout their 360 just 4 halo cuz they cudnt wait til the ps3 came out. now that they hav the 360 they r goin 2 cum up with watevr excuse ther is 2 try(and fail)and say y 360 is bettr. IT IS NOT & WIL NEVR B.
360 fans hav been blinded by superior online play, halo, and gears, THATS IT. look @ the facts & the games. multiplatform games look similar cuz the developers 1: dont want one 2 look bettr than the othr cuz that will irritate the fans and Microsoft may brake away from their partnership, 2: take longr 2 make the ps3 version look bettr, 3:LAZY, 4. INEXPERIENCED!
The 360 isnt capable of performing all of the things that the ps3 does @ the same time. ie. the better the 360’s graphics look, the slower it will run and wont b abl 2 do all of the things that developers want 2 do.(ps3 proves this with uncharted, upcoming HEAVY RAIN and killzone 2) y do you think some developers will only giv birth 2 games on ps3. insomniac and naughty dog r free 2 go wherevr the hell they want.
if sum1 wil show me a 360 game that has all of the following, i wil admit i’m wrong: bettr graphics than eithr killzone 2 or heavy rain, b able 2 put out these graphics AND hav REALISTIC motion in all parts of the body(lookin @ u halo, and yes i do own an xbox), and hav many interactions with environments(actual things movin wen u touch them)
also, after u pay 4 2 years of online, and all the extra parts u need 4 the 360 that came with the ps3, u r spending mor or the same on the 360
finally, does any1 wunder y the ps3 is mor expensive? sony put mor badass things in2 it that peopl take 4 granted.
I AM NO PS FANBOY. this is 4 all the blinded 360 fanboys that keep defending their 5 good game system and wont shut the hell up. this was only half of the things that prove the ps3 is superior. if any1 disagrees, talk 2 me bout wat features, etc. the 360 has that r bettr and we’ll c if we can cum 2 a conclusion.( wile writing this i was not angry in any way, i just saw this article and thout i’d giv sum feedback. i’v got plenty mor cold hard facts if any1 wants2 hear em)
Heavy Rain doesn’t even have gameplay .. it’s a quick time event game.
You dont control anything in the game, you just push a specific button at critical times during FMV sequences .. lame !
i find it funny that youve now lost all semblance of the “psfan” youre name claims you to be
You push a button for your character to move in the direction that you want them to move.
“quick time event game”
“quick time event game”
“quick time event game”
It’s still gameplay, you control on how your character interacts with the environment at hand. It was designed like this.
You dont have to be a rabid fanboy to be a PS3 fan.
As for Heavy Rain, I call it like I see it.
For a psfan you sure do seem to be undermining a lot of the positive things the ps3 has going for it.
Really Daniel ? How so ?
Should I be like the rest of the Sony Fanboy’s and blindly accept anything Sony is selling as the be all end all ?
I’ll pass on that logic and do the research.
Besides, how am I undermining the PS3 ? .. Do you actually think that because I’m giving my opinion and sharing common knowlege that I’m somehow going to impact sales of the PS3 ?
C’mon man. Get a grip.
There’s a reply button, learn to use it.
Fanboys=LOLS, seriously leave people be of what they choose, if they love Sony so let them. They have the right to choose of what they want to do, don’t try forcing crap down there throat. Let the people believe Sony.
You can have an opinion, just keep it to yourself. Otherwise things like this will occur.
it may b a quiktime game, but it or killzone 2 r supposed 2 b the 2 games with the greatest graphics evr. but i get wat ur sayin: heavy rain may hav the best graphics and great motion movements, but all u do is quiktime. ur rite bout dat but wat bout killzone 2? its supposed 2 hav the greatest graphics pushed out(we’ll nevr no til reviews & game cums out), and is supposed 2 hav hella interactions w/ environment and very realistic body movements.
Rumor: these 2 games r only usin 45% of ps3 potential. ppl who r takin theses comments seriously can look it up & let me no if its tru
And its kool dat we r all givin out our opinions but i hope no1 is gettin angry and takin evry1s comments personal. just sayin
Just to let you know they haven’t reached 45% of PS3’s potential yet. Not even Killzone 2 nor Heavy Rain.
If you believe that your in for a rude awakining.
That is BS. And don’t give me that XDR crap. Regular GDDR Ram is better for games than that XDR crap. And with 256 MB of GDDR Ram on the PS3(I know it is GDDR3), it wont be a suprise if your Killzone 2 winds up having low-res textures just like MGS4(note I didnt say bad graphics, I said bad textures). SO to tell you the truth, the PS3 is probably using about 60-80 percent of its graphics capabilities on Killzone 2(note I said graphics capabilities not power. If we were talking about RAW power, then pretty much anyone with a dedicated graphics card on their PC wins the power award without much problem). Saying that they have only reached 45% of the PS3’s potential is very misleading. While the PS3 may have that much more power, rendering wise, it is nowhere near that level of power usage. And if you want to talk about potential, the Gears of War producers withdrew their comment about almost maxing out the 360’s graphics power. The 360’s graphics power wasn’t even close to being maxed out because of new optimization techniques and revisionments and refinings of the Unreal Engine 3. Thats exactly why I didn’t buy a PS3, all these sony supported devs talk about stuff so that in a way they are true, yet they are still deceiving you. Maybe if these devs were less bull crappy with their statements, I would buy a PS3.
Congrats you used the reply button.
To bad you don’t have the knowledge of these things more than me.
Maybe you should start keeping your ideas to your head.
I advise that you learn to spell awakening correctly so next time I can take your response more seriously.
i said rumor. but just think wat a ps3 game @ 100% wud look like. that’l nevr happen but i think sony shud b smart and start workin on a game now that wil use 100%. but since it wud take YEARS, they shud wait til its almost done 2 talk bout it
although i mostly dont agree with what you say ive got to agree ps3 graphics are already super sexy without even getting into killzone 2. They say it doesnt run at 45% but can games honestly get twice as powerful as that let alone more than twice. Im guessing killzone 2 will be like 60% of the best game to be released. Im kind of doubting any game will use 100% since it would take forever and an incredible amount of skill and planning. Also killzone 2 probably is using arounding 50% because honestly that game looks more realistic than my life lol
@ G
lol
Also, did u say u didnt agree with wat i said or AERFOX? im just curious
Red Ring of Death?
i wonder if killzone 3 will be out for ps3 or ps4? Anyway things are changing i must say. Xbox had a great 2007(their best year by far) but 2008 and 2009 are looking better on the ps3 side… ps3 has more and better exlusives this year(MGS4 HELLO that game is the best thing out for all three this gen consoles by far) and 2009…. honestly… KZ2, white knight chron(lol),new ratchet woo, heavy rain, uncharted 2 please?, god of war 3 and maybeee if were lucky the full fledged GT5(kind of doubting it). Whereas xboxs main lineup is essentially fable 2 and gears 2(looking way too much like the first for my liking but good for the fan or as an entry game) for this whole year and i havent heard anything about xbox in 2009. Theres that alan wake game thats supposed to be up there with heavy rain but it hasnt been mentioned. I think youd have to be pretty ignorant to not admit ps3 has a pretty bright future.
just because you haven’t heard about what is happening on the 360’s side of things, doesn’t mean that nothing is happening. True, 08 is a GREAT year for both sides.But, Microsoft has a lot of games forthcoming that they just haven’t told anyone about. Their strategy has always been that way. Hit you with a massive amount of great games, then make you wonder if the console is dying, then hit you with another massive amount of great games.
OFF TOPIC ALERT!!
this is sumthin that is kind of irritating me so i wanted 2 c if any1 else noticed dis or feels the same.
hav u seen how BADASS the main character from Final Fantasy Versus 13 looks in CGI? his hair, his face, an average amount of muscle. Well i saw sum screenshots of him standing in actual game play and he looks like a fukin ANOREXIC EMO.
I completely understand that gameplay isnt supposed 2 look as gud as CGI, but they need 2 @least make him look like the SAME PERSON
You can try finding an article about Final Fantasy Versus XIII and ask it there, then one of us will gladly answer you for future reference.
It’s still in production, and it won’t be out for quite awhile. So it’ll take time til they fix it.
i hope they fix it. it doesnt even look like the same guy
ok this is great…
Killzone 2= Low textures and great animations, gameplay is like COD3.
MGS4= This is what gets me, it looks just like Assassin’s Creed. No different at all. It’s only 5 hours long, Gameplay is dull. Best thing is the story behind it.
Resistence 2= Ummm… Low textures and cannot touch Gears Of War2.
Uncharted= Great looking game, decent fun game, but in no way comes even close to being as fun or as great as Gears Of War 1.
Alan Wake vs. Heavy Rain
Wake= You can actually play it.
Rain= You hit a button on time.
Pretty much everything I just stated is fact…
Killzone 2= 75% of PS3 power
Gears Of War 2= 66% of 360 power
Who has more rev in the engine???
Your comment is invalid and deceiving.
ur ignorant…
I’m ignorant?
i hav 2 agree with fox. also, no one knows how much power is gonna b used in killzone 2 yet. How the hell r u gonna compare alan wake & gears? your opinions r totally thrown out ther without having any proof of anything. very random statements
im not sure who said it earlier, but he made a gud point that i complately 4got 2 mention in my 1st post. the power of the games looks at multiple things: graphics, gameplay, motion, active environments,amount of content(how big the world is and how much objects r in the game), and how many different things the characters can do
wen i said alan wake and gears, i ment alan wake and heavy rain. oops
Killzone 2 hasn’t hit gold yet, and still in development.
Don’t compare apples and oranges.
Low textures for Resistance 2? It’s your opinion. I’ll have more fun with Resistance 2 than Gears of Wars 2
I loved Uncharted, it was longer than Gears of War, and far superior in my opinion. Again your comparing two different games.
Both Heavy Rain and Alan Wake are different, apples and oranges again.
Heavy Rain you play too.
Everything you stated is deceiving.
Show proof that Gears 2 and Killzone 2 are using that raw power in the consoles.
Neither have the more rev engine at the moment.
you can see the proof from screenshots…
im not gonna lie killzone 2 looks great, but where the fuck are the textures, you compare that to GOW2 and i mean damn and gears is open now its no longer corridor play…
Again they don’t state how much power they use.
Still in production, ummm not really Gears 2 is still enclosed.
u must not watch the videos…
Yes I have seen the videos.
But where do they say how much power in each console they are using?
u call urself a damn gamer, what an idiot…
i own all 3 systems and call it like i see it
that comment was to Aerfox
I own all 3 also, you should know more of the person before calling them an idiot.
call it like i see it…
Okay, but you NEVER saw me, so you can’t call what you see.
i just did
“ur ignorant…”
4 future reference, can ppl say who they’re talkin 2 at the beginning of their post or reply
ie.
@ Anthony
that way no 1 is confused
this site can burn in hell, and all ps3 fangays need to be decapitated and have their ugly ass heads stuck on a fence so little kids can use them as pinatas…
VIVA Pinata
Again your just trolling around.
PLAY WHAT YOU WANT!!!!!!!!
Don’t try changing people, for god’s sake.
There are psychiatrists for people like you.
@ J BIZZLE
ur probobly one of those 360 fanboys who lies bout ownin all the systems so no 1 figurs out that u bought the 360 cuz u wer impatient & cudnt wait a year 4 the real nex gen system. And cuz of halo, and r now board out of ur fukin mind with it and gears, and cant afford 2 buy a ps3. gettin horny off the only 3 exclusive games coming out worth mentioning (Gears 2, fable 2, left $ dead). stuk with a syatem that has the biggest fail rate evr and brings no new innovations and gameplay elements 2 the table.
Notice the BIG 2s or 3s after all ur badass exclusive game names.
im pretty sure i own all 3 systems, i do not own n e games on ps3 cuz they are crap…
i own about 73 or more games on 360
only have wii sports for wii…
pickin up another 9 games within the next 2 months…
until sony shows me something where i can finally say thats actually impresses me, then they are shit…
by the way someone commented earlier that killzone and heavy rain are goin to be the best lookin games ever…
he must have never played crysis, probably becuz he is 2 poor to afford a computer of that capability…
how pathetic…
Then why did you even bother purchasing a PS3?
Again your just trolling around.
ok lets not get upset. lets just change it 2 anothr topic.
Also, cyrtek had great graphics, but it didnt have the multiple othr things that uses power like i mentioned earlier.
Im not sure but i think some company released an article bout how cyrtek had great graphics but missed many othr elements that makes a game bettr than the others. but it was an awsum game
@ Anthony
I bought my 360 for a couple reasons. Yes I do have a 360, but I knew I was going to get the PlayStation 3 on Day One, guess what I did. The reason I bought the 360 was to hold me over until the PS3 came out, and for Dead Rising/Mass Effect.
Valve mentioned that they are into consideration on making Left 4 Dead on the PS3, but if they do they won’t start until after the PC/360 versions are done.
Like Anthony said Microsoft hasn’t brought any new innovation to the table.
Who cares what system is better. Its not just the system. Its the people who design them. If you have a system with all the power in the world and no good developers for it than its not going to be good. Just shut the hell up. No one wants to hear what system you like. Just be happy you have the luxiary of being able to do the things you can with the systems of today.
Viva Italia.
tru
THANK YOU
Also i didnt want 2 hav 2 do this but i am. if sum 1 gives me a bettr 360 upcoming list i wil shut up:
(copy & paste)
Afrika
Amphibian Man
Angel Rings [Working Title]
BioWare Project
Buzz!: Quiz TV
Castlevania PS3
Crash Commando
Croteam Project
Crytek Project [Rumored]
Dark Cloud 3
DC Universe MMO
Dragon Age – EGM 5/2007 – Page 42
Dreamers – LINK
Driver PS3
Eat Sleep Play PS3 Project 2
Eat Sleep Play PS3 Project 3
EyeDentify – LINK
Eyepet – LINK **NEW**
Factor 5 Project #2 [Untitled] – LINK
Fat Princess – LINK **NEW**
FIA World Touring Car Championship – LINK
Fifth Phantom Saga – LINK
Final Fantasy Versus XIII – LINK
Free Realms – LINK
Fumito Ueda SOTC / ICO [Rumored Project 2]
God of War III – LINK
Grand Turismo 5 – LINK
Gretzky NHL [Working Title]
Heavenly Sword 2 – LINK
Heavy Rain – LINK **NEW**
Infamous – LINK
Jak and Daxter: The Lost Frontier – LINK
Killzone 2 – LINK
Kingdom Hearts 3 [Rumored] – LINK
Linger In-Shadow – LINK
LittleBigPlanet – LINK
MAG: Massive Action Game – LINK **NEW**
Metal Gear Solid 5
Metro 2033: The Last Refuge – LINK
MLB ‘09: The Show – This is Inevitable.
Monster Carnival [Working Title] – LINK
MotorStorm: Pacific Rift – LINK
Musashi PS3 [Rumored] – X-Play 8/21/2008 (Top 5, 0:10) **NEW**
Namco PS3 “Tales Of†RPG – LINK LINK
Namco PS3 Sports Project – LINK
Naruto: Ultimate Ninja Storm – LINK **NEW**
NBA ‘09: The Inside – LINK **NEW**
NCSoft PS3 Project 1 – LINK LINK
NCSoft PS3 Project 2 – LINK LINK
NCSoft PS3 Project 3 – LINK LINK
NCSoft PS3 Project 4 – LINK LINK
N-Cube – LINK
nDreams / SCE Project [Untitled]
Powerup Forever
PixelJunk Dungeons
Planet One
Project Psychic [Working Title]
Pterodon FPS Project [Untitled]
Quantic Dream Project 2
Ratchet & Clank Future: [Untitled]
Red Barron
Redwood Falls
Rengoku: The End of the Century
Resistance 2 [Working Title] – LINK
Returning Alive [Working Title]
Rockstar PS3 Exclusive Project [Untitled]
Rockstar Old West PS3 Project [Untitled]
Romance of the Three Kingdoms PS3
Sam Suede: Undercover Exposure
Seed Studio Project
Shin Megami Tensei
Sly Cooper 4
SOCOM: Confrontation
Soldner-X
Starbreeze Next-Gen Project [Untitled] – LINK
Syphon Filter PS3
Tecmo Action-Adventure [Untitled]
Tekken 6
thatgamecompany Project #3 [Untitled]
The Agency – LINK
Twelve Interactive Sci-Fi action game
Twisted Metal PS3 (Working Title)
Uncharted 2 [Working Title]
Unknown Realms – LINK
Valkyria Chronicles
WarDevil Enigma – LINK
Way of the Samurai 3 – LINK
Wheel of Fortune – LINK
White Knight Chronicles – LINK
Wipeout HD – LINK
Yakuza 3 – LINK
Zone of the Enders 3 – LINK
And these r only the games that look interesting
muhhhhahaa FANBOYS
PS3 has better CPU unfortunately Xbox360 HAS better GPU from Ati (UU- Unified Shader) Sony made terrible mistake with “old” YES OLD (pixel/shader) units based on OLD like my grandpa GeForce 7xxx.
Da mastah da “praised” by fanboys CELL has nothing to doo Cell is boored…
Och… and WHAT about problems with Full HD (on both consoles – Haze
) not enough memory sorry chams 
no REAL FULL HD on your “supercomputer”
2011 i want NEW PS4 – SAME Processor (little tuned) NEW Graphics chip and MORE Memory +512 and FASTER BD-ROM for GOD sake!!! And then ONLY the Xbox will be OWNED ….
OCh and last one thing. DO YOU REMEMBER WHAT Sony SAID BEFORE they launch PS3? I DO!!! They said that PS3 will be FAR MORE SUPERIOR then Xbox 360 FROM THE START not IN DA FUTURE and not “maybe next year”.
agreed
I can’t understand on what you just said.
lol neithr did i
Im goin 2 get a 360 once microsoft makes games that do diffrent shit than that was in last gen.
No 1 has really done it yet, but atleast sony is trying. microsoft stiks 2 the same old stuf.
look @ LBP (sharin levels, downloadin to utube,puttin photos i game, plus hella mor shit), eye pet (dont care 4 it but it is new innovation), HOME, Socom. nothing big, but atleast it is sumthin new 2 do
PS3 is better than the Xbox 360, not because of the hardware but because of the games and future proofness.
F*ck Micro$haft! AND their noisy unreliable POS console! AND their f*cking useless customer support!
No way I’ll waste any more $ on M$.
thats y the 360 is actually mor expensive than the ps3. not any mor bcuz of its latest price cut, but b4 that
this clearly shows the ps3 is much more powerful.
PS3 CPU:
- Cell Processor
- PowerPC-base Core @ 3.2GHz
- 1 VMX vector unit per core
- 512KB L2 cache
- 7 x SPE @ 3.2GHz
- 7 x 128b 128 SIMD GPRs
- 7 x 256KB SRAM for SPE
- 1 of 8 SPEs reserved for redundancy
- total floating point performance: 218 GFLOPS
Xbox360 Custom IBM PowerPC-based CPU
• Three symmetrical cores running at 3.2 GHz each
• Two hardware threads per core; six hardware threads total
• VMX-128 vector unit per core; three total • 128 VMX-128 registers per hardware thread • 1 MB L2 cache
PS3 GPU (Graphics Processing Unit):
- RSX @ 550MHz
- 1.8 TFLOPS floating point performance
- Full HD (up to 1080p) x 2 channels
- Multi-way programmable parallel floating point shader pipelines
Bandwidth:
- Main RAM 25.6GB per second
- VRAM 22.4GB per second
- RSX 20GB per second (write) +15GB per second (read)
- SB< 2.5GB per second (write) + 2.5GB per second (read
Xbox360 Custom ATI Graphics Processor
• 500MHz processor
• 10 MB of embedded DRAM
• 48-way parallel floating-point dynamically scheduled shader pipelines
• Unified shader architecture
Overall System Floating-Point Performance
• 1 teraflop
and rasadaf is fuckin stupid
by the way before you start saying i dont know what im talking about i own all 3 consoles. xbox360 elite, ps3, and the wii. i compaired them on my samsung 64″ lcd rear projection hdtv, and the ps3 proves to be the best graphics and online wise. the xbox360 does have a better online store setup, but ps3 stays lag free while xbox360 lags like shit. here is my xbl gamertag and my ps acount name if you want to know. switchblade129 is for ps3. switch blade129 for xbox360. no space for ps3
*Cough*
Late, I know.
Firstly, the 360 has 512MB of RAM in TOTAL. The ps3 has 256 for the System, and 256 for the Video. The system can access all 256MB from the video, effectively making 512MB for system resources.
Secondly, I play Crysis on Very High at 1280×1024, and not once has my video card used more than 256MB, in fact, it has only ever reached 248. The textures are streamed in and out of the SYSTEM RAM.
Therefor, a regular game being run at 720p would use up (I’m assuming) aprox. 128 – 200MB, leaving a good 700 something MB for the system, allowing fairly hi-res textures to be used. It’s all a matter of how you use the resources.
I personally can’t wait for Killzone 2, and by pure preference, I think it looks better than Crysis (the later has a dull art style and terrible looking vegetation on stock settings. Though the interiors are nice, the game doesn’t revolve around them at all, making it’s indoor graphical power useless.)